One in, one out' is just a nice game name

Due to its over 900-kilometer border with Syria, Turkey is the biggest victim of the wave of refugees that flows from that country because of its ongoing civil war. Turkey has been hosting nearly 3 million Syrians in its territory for many years. In addition to spending billions of dollars on refugees, the government has to shoulder the socio-economic challenges that refugees bring. When the matter becomes a topical issue, the attitude from EU countries that are the main destination for refugees becomes a subject of criticism for good reason, because so far European politicians have preached human rights at official meetings and conferences, but then have not walked the talk. Last year they realized that they could no longer avoid the crisis with this all-too-familiar attitude, as migration and the terror that stems from this dynamism started pushing at Europe's door. Finally, the EU reached an agreement with Turkey after months of negotiations.

The revised agreement between the EU and Turkey is based on a "one in, one out" formula. Although the formula's name is reminiscent of childhood games, it is serious, as it stipulates that one Syrian living in Turkey's refugee camps will be settled in Europe for each Syrian sent back from Greece, and that non-Syrians will never be allowed to enter Europe. What will Turkey receive in return? According to the agreement, the EU will accelerate efforts to allow visa-free travel for Turkish nationals to the Schengen area and will pay some portion of the promised 3.3 billion euros in aid in October. Such great altruism Europe: Have a heart. The bloc's population exceeds 500 million, and EU per capita income is nearly $30,000 in countries where there are just several thousand refugees. Official figures, however, reveal that a total of 2.7 million Syrians live in Turkey where the population is 80 million, and the per capita income is around $10,000. The actual number of Syrians in Turkey is even higher. The same applies to Lebanon, which hosts 1.3 million refugees, and other Middle Eastern countries. I leave it to you to bear these figures in mind and estimate the minimum number of refugees that the EU must take in. Forget international law and justice, how can the agreement be implemented and what it will serve?

Let's suppose that you have convinced Turkey. How will you force desperate Syrian mothers and fathers who run the risk of death by going to sea with their babies in winter to abide by this agreement? How can you guarantee the integration of refugees if you only take those who are healthy and qualified for good jobs like European colonialists that only picked slaves with healthy teeth? Have you forgotten that the terrorists who attacked Paris and Brussels were European citizens? Can you not see that border agreements remain irrelevant, as borders have become vulnerable and terrorism has become global?

The EU must stop deceiving itself, its prospective member Turkey and the desperate refugees. We all know that this agreement cannot save the day let alone bring structural solutions to the refugee crisis. Thus, the EU must fairly share the burden of Turkey and countries like Greece that shoulder the major of responsibility despite being poorer than the EU average, and must make political moves despite the U.S. and Russia to establish a safe zone in Syria to stop the waves of fleeing refugees in the short run and to aim for Syria's Bashar Assad's exit, as he is the root cause of the problem, in the long run.

Melih Altınok

Read more

Tension in the refugee problem and EU-Turkey relations

Tension in the refugee problem and EU-Turkey relations

Has still refugees on the agenda of EU-Turkey summit and the EU Joint Action Plan considers the best processing. Accordingly, not enough to prevent illegal immigration to the Turkey's European migrants came to him in the door is still open and keep the readmission agreement also argues that a number of problems experienced.
In short, the EU Turkey is still to take refugees, of condoning them to go to Europe and accused refused to accept the returned those captured.

Turkey, in fact, does not act in this manner. But let's say he does it, what's the wonder is to blame?

EU side off every month suggests that around 2000, and the number of ways that Europe wants Turkey to drop below 1000 this figure. This technical sense means removing illegal immigration Turkey's efforts to stop twice. Well, there are two ways; Turkey aims to limit entries, on the other hand to block the exits.

This formula seems simple on paper, in practice no means easy. Turkey's security forces, giving a costly effort is increasing every day to prevent illegal immigration. Thus, the first obstacle of the matter, based on financial matters.

Expectations from Turkey

Another aspect of the problem over the name of the law on foreign migration. The law can be passed to the European way of non-reciprocal measures taken at that time, for example, it needs to be very good processing of intelligence sharing. This problem is not only technically possible to be solved by Turkey.

The EU side, this type of illegal migrants to overcome obstacles "legal immigrants" are waiting to be translated. In other words, Turkey's own land "East" who is demanding from the stings refugees, not asylum seekers. 1951 Commentary of the Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and put just giving refugee status to those from the Council of Europe member states, Turkey is required to remove this commentary.

If Turkey responds positively to this request, they agreed to place the camps as refugees. These camps will be established camps like today; It will not deviate from entering into. Just, close to 4 million Palestinians for 68 years, will be dropped and forgotten under such terrible living conditions in 61 refugee camps; meanwhile it will stop expenses camps fluctuates much less in the form of external support-national support.

EU promises

Let's say that Turkey has fulfilled all these requirements, even in the readmission agreement with Tunisia and Algeria, according to the EU could not resist even take the country to the EU in return for what you do?

It will give money for refugees. But that does not have to give money; perhaps to be kind. So stove, blankets, pots to be sent. There will also be selected and brought to Europe from refugee camps in Turkey. as modern slave markets, "useful" ones, probably men will be in a small number of European refugees in the group. Do so will have missed classes, but there is not known to be sympathetic to this proposal also reminded that all European countries. So, appro refugee issues, as "drop in the bucket" of a support, as well as the realization even suspect it.

Now you need to ask again to the EU. Why Turkey 2000 the number of illegal immigrants who are enduring another major cost to decrease below 1000 said. Turkey will assume additional obligations, to see concretely what it gets in return. As long as the promise of EU support, this issue is not EU-Turkey rapprochement, it would like to move away.

Read more

Turkey’s repeat elections: the Kurdish wildcard

The PKK’s terror, which ended the reconciliation process despite the state’s wishes and efforts, and the HDP’s supportive statements of this terror seem to shape the electorate’s behavior in the Nov. 1 elections

Turkey’s election cycle continues, as the country heads for a new round of elections this November. Following the June 2015 elections, it proved impossible to establish a coalition government, and now, the caretaker government under Justice and Development Party (AK Party) leadership, is taking the country to “repeat” elections. Despite receiving nearly 41 percent of the vote, the AK Party could not form a single party government because the Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) passed the national threshold with 13 percent and secured 80 parliamentary seats. The June elections showed that the electorate still saw the AK Party as the only party capable of governing, while denying the ruling party yet another single party government. The wildcard – that is, the HDP passing the national threshold – worked against the AK Party in June. Whether the HDP can surpass the threshold once again in a maximum security political atmosphere will be critical to these next election results.

The AK Party’s coalition talks with the Republican People’s Party (CHP) yielded no results, and the HDP had ruled out the possibility of a coalition with the ruling AK Party even before the elections. The Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) set preconditions – a definitive end to the Kurdish resolution process, a full investigation of the Dec. 17 and Dec. 25 corruption allegations and the restoration of the traditionally ceremonial role of the president – that made it virtually impossible to even discuss a coalition government. Under these circumstances and after the failure of the coalition talks, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan tasked Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu to form a caretaker government. During the coalition talks, the opposition parties had either ruled out coalition negotiations (as in the case of the HDP and MHP) or interpreted the election results as a total defeat for the AK Party (as in the case of the CHP).While the political process could not produce a coalition government, the security environment shifted with the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) and PKK attacks inside Turkey. As a result, political dynamics heading into this round of elections are significantly different than they were before the June elections, particularly in the wake of the renewed fighting between state security forces and the PKK. In July, the PKK announced the end of a two-year-long cease-fire and resorted to summary executions of security officials. The pretext for the PKK to end the cease-fire was the Suruç bombing that resulted in the deaths of 33 activists. The attack was linked to ISIS, and in its aftermath, Turkey announced that it would participate militarily in the U.S.-led international coalition against ISIS. The PKK claimed, however, that the government was supporting ISIS – a propaganda theme developed ever since the Kobani crisis. The PKK tried to bolster ethnic solidarity among Kurds in Turkey and in Syria for its regional as well as recruitment goals.

Turkey’s hesitation to act during the Kobani crisis was linked to questions about the political goals of the Democratic Union Party (PYD) in Syria. The PKK conducted an effective public relations campaign, promoting the idea that the Turkish state was supporting ISIS against the Kurds. This argument found resonance with many Kurds and resulted in dismal results for the AK Party, especially in the Kurdish-majority cities of southeast Turkey. As the country moves into the November elections, the course of the conflict between the security forces and the

PKK will undoubtedly have a strong bearing on the Kurdish vote. It will also play a large factor in determining whether the AK Party has the ability to once again be competitive against the HDP in the region.

As a result of the high-security political climate created by the fighting, stability as a theme of the campaign will likely have a significant impact on the election results. The Kurdish vote will be critical, and the AK Party and the HDP will compete for conservative Kurdish votes. However, the electorate in general, including the Kurds, will make judgments about how their vote will help bring stability. If voters sense that lack of stability is a direct result of the failed coalition forming process and the ensuing fighting, they may move towards voting for the AK Party in the hopes that it will garner enough votes to establish a stable, single-party government.It will be important to see who will be blamed for making the formation of a coalition government impossible. For instance, while the MHP appeared to have a principled stance in the immediate aftermath of the June elections, many inside and outside the MHP questioned the wisdom of the party’s refusal to be part of any coalition scenarios. Some MHP voters may veer toward the AK Party because the MHP has no prospect of coming to power other than as part of a coalition – a prospect that party leader Devlet Bahçeli has made impossible through his maximalist preconditions. Whether the AK Party can take back some conservative nationalist votes from the MHP through the stability argument will define its chances of forming a government on its own.

In June, the HDP was able to present itself as more than a “Kurdish party” to appeal to non-Kurdish segments of society, including liberals and Alevis among others. Many voted for the HDP strategically to counterbalance the AK Party for which there were no true alternatives. This November, however, in an environment where the HDP has been unable to unequivocally denounce PKK violence, non-Kurdish voters will likely be more hesitant to vote for the HDP. It will be critical to see if the HDP can keep such voters in its camp and whether the PKK leadership’s public reprimand of the HDP – and HDP’s inability to confront them – will make a significant difference in the ballot box. Furthermore, the nationalist backlash against the HDP may limit their ability to maneuver and appeal to non-Kurdish voters. In the end, however, all this may add up to only marginal changes in voting percentages and the HDP may still be able to surpass the 10 percent threshold.

The resolution process, which promised to bring about a political solution to the Kurdish question, appears to be shelved at the moment – “in the refrigerator” as Erdoğan remarked. It does not appear likely that the state security forces will end their efforts to reestablish control in southeastern Turkey before the November elections, barring a surprise call from imprisoned PKK leader Abdullah Öcalan for the PKK to return to the negotiation table. The Kurdish wildcard, in its different manifestations, such as the renewed fighting or the HDP’s electoral success, will be the most important factor shaping voter behavior in November.

* Research director at SETA Foundation in Washington, DC

http://en.akademikperspektif.com/2015/09/28/turkeys-repeat-elections-the-kurdish-wildcard/

Read more

Britain Joins the Drone Kill Club

The latest drone executions of the two Muslim British citizens by the British government gives rise to the question of how a country can present itself as a defender of international humanitarian law while using these killing machines.

On Sept. 9, the British government announced that it had assassinated two British citizens, Reyyad Khan and Ruhal Amin, by the use of drones. In Britain, news of the assassinations has been dominated by two questions: Was the killing morally justified and was the killing legal?

In order to protect itself from charges of illegality, the British government was fastidious in its desire to show that its actions were absolutely legal and based on the sound legal advice of the government’s attorney-general. The legal rationalization for this extra-juridical killing was, in the first place, given as being based on the principle of self-defense. David Cameron claimed the British government was forced to resort to using drones because it was in danger of attacks directed by these two individuals. When pressed for details on the nature of the imminent threat, British ministers spoke rather airily of reasons of national security and of planned attacks at major events, which, in fact, had already taken place and therefore the threat was neither imminent nor possible any longer. Even Cameron’s own party, has raised doubt about whether there was a real imminent threat. Subsequently, the government put forward another rationale for the drone strikes: the killings were carried out because of the collective threat against Iraq. Furthermore, it transpired that the British government has a hit list of Muslims who it considers to be extremist who are to be assassinated.

DRONES AGAINST THE US

Of course, state-sanctioned and state-actioned assassinations are hardly new. Western plutocracies, have, however, tried to use the fig-leaf of liberal-democracy to preach due process and rule of law, and have publically condemned assassinations as part of normal statecraft. The drone revolution however has lowered the perception of risk in carrying out assassinations and increased the temptation to use murder as a weapon of the “war on terror.” Pilotless vehicles have been used for aerial surveillance missions and even as bomb-carrying weapons since the 19th century, for example in the American Civil War and later during World War I and II. However the scale of its use by the U.S. presently – particularly during the Obama presidency – and the increase in the range and capabilities of drones, has meant the blurring of the rules of combat. Drones have not only been used by the U.S. in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan; they have also been used to target militants in Somalia, Pakistan and Yemen – outside the U.S.-declared war zones. As far as we know only the United States, Britain and Israel have used drones for targeted killings. The benefits, as are seen in those countries using them or seeking to use them, are that the operators are not at risk, they are meant to hit targets with great precision and, unlike other aircraft, they can hover for hours over potential targets waiting for a window of opportunity to strike. We do know that the supposed precision is not a guarantee of accuracy, as the loss of civilian lives can attest to. We also know that although they may succeed in killing their targets, the larger objectives are not always served, as drone strikes alienate those who control them from the violence they unleash while also contributing to instability and creating a backlash of public opinion outside the countries that operate them.

The debate that drone assassination has generated is important because it shows that the neo-conservative strategy for fighting the war on terror has now become hegemonic. The British had prided themselves on their approach of treating terrorism as a criminal rather than military problem. This assassination shifts the British position to being closer to the approach undertaken by the U.S., Israel and other neo-conservative regimes like Canada and Australia, in which policing is being increasingly militarized. The effects can be seen not just in abstract terms but also in the equipment, tactics and training as well as practices of many police forces, most clearly seen in the United States as the Black Lives Matter campaign exposes the frequency of police killings, particularly of African-American and Hispanic American men. The militarization of policing is not simply a matter of using a more robust approach to crime or the threat of crime, but rather it undermines democratic-liberal conceptions of citizenship. It also has an international dimension as many police forces in the U.S. are now staffed by men and women who were involved in the American occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq, and have been trained and equipped by specialists from the Israeli occupation of Palestine.

VIOLATING HUMANITARIAN LAW

The criticism of the British stance however has tended to focus almost exclusively on whether drone attacks violate international humanitarian law or the morality of a self-avowed democratic state executing its citizens without any due process. The United Nations has condemned these operations for their lack of accountability, transparency, violation of international law and overlooking civilian casualties.

Yet these criticisms miss the wider point. The war on terror has systematically stripped Western plutocracies of their claims to legitimacy and they contribute to the continuous erosion of the distinction between war and peace and the frontiers of national sovereignty. Water-boarding, rectal infusion and target-killings have become calling-cards of the war on terror. Driven on by a neo-conservative agenda, Western governments have been led to believe that coercion without legitimacy is sustainable when the difference in capacity to inflict harm is so great, that their enemies are impotent in the face of Western might. When countries who consider themselves to be guardians of the moral and legal framework of international order start to break the law, it is not a minor matter. In the same way, when police officers act like gangsters it is the same as gangsters acting like gangsters. These killings are just another sign that the war on terror is nothing more than a dirty war fought on a global scale and is beginning to signal the degeneration of statecraft into gangsterism and thuggery. The dream of a cosmopolitan world in which international laws and conventions contain the constant possibility of violence is giving way to a Hobbesian world order, in which the veneer of international agreements and laws are being worn dangerously thin. The United States led the invasion of Iraq arguing for the purity of its aims and desire to bring freedom, peace and prosperity. After Abu Gharib and Guantanamo, all they can say is “we torture less than Saddam did.” The drone executions of Muslim British citizens by Britain is another sign that the international system that emerged after the Cold War is beginning to unravel. When countries who claim to uphold international law start acting like gangsters, the entire system begins to lose legitimacy; as a consequence society is more violence not less, more instable, not less and more danger, not less. There is a need for countries that have not succumbed to the neo-conservative/neo-liberal offensives, to articulate a vision of a world that offers more than gangsterism on a global scale.

* Professor in Rhetoric, University of Leeds

Read more

PKK Doğu’dan, Aydın Doğan Batı’dan vuruyor

Dağlıca'da on altı askerimiz şehit oldu. Iğdır'da on üç polisimiz şehit oldu. Ne demişti o “ölü sevici”; “Asker de polis de yenilecek, PKK kazanacak.” İşte o sözlerden bir gün sonra Dağlıca'da askerlerimiz, iki gün sonra Iğdır'da polislerimiz şehit edildi.

Tam da söylediği gibi..
“Türkiye saldırı altında” derken, “bu terör değil, bir işgal girişimi” derken, birilerinin “Evet, vakit geldi. Türkiye cephesini açın” talimatı verdiğini söylerken medyadaki dile, siyasetteki dile ve terör saldırıları arasındaki ilişkiye dikkat çekerken bunları kastediyordum.

“Dar anlamda terör yok, topyekün saldırı var” derken bunu kastediyordum. Bu “ölü sevici”, bu kandan beslenen adamın her sözünün PKK'ya verilen talimat olduğunu, dağdaki kardeşiüzerinden verdiği mesaj olduğunu, her konuştuğunda Türkiye'nin kan gölüne döndüğünü bu yüzden söylüyordum.

KANDİL'DEN O MEDYA MERKEZİNE ŞER EKSENİ

Açın gözlerinizi. Mesele sadece terör olmadığı gibi sadece PKK da değildir. Kandil'deki adamlardan HDP karargahlarına, İstanbul'daki medya merkezlerine kadar bir şer ekseni kurulmuştur. Bu şer ekseni, siyasi muhalefet adı altında meşru muhalefeti de yönlendirmekte, terör örgütlerini tek çatı altındatoplamaktadır. Bu şer ekseni, bir iç işgal denemekte, PKK'yı silahlı güç olarak kullanmaktadır.

Türkiye, Doğu'da PKK ve HDP, Batı'da o kirli ortaklıktarafından vurulmaktadır. PKK tanımlanmış bir tehdittir.Tanımlanamayan tehditlere dikkat edin. Bu yüzden özellikle bu tehdide dikkat çekiyorum. İç işgalcilere, entelektüel teröre ve siyasi iktidarsızlara vurgu yapıyorum. Topyekün saldırıya karşı önce bu cepheyi çözmek farzdır.

O ölü sevici Selahattin Demirtaş'ı pazarlayan adama iyi bakın. Medya organları üzerinden terörü aklayana, teröristleri koruyana, Türkiye acıya boğulurken ülkeyi başka meselelerle meşgul edip teröre kamuflaj sağlayana dikkat edin. PKK Doğu'dan saldırırken, işgal girişimini Doğu'dan başlatırken Aydın Doğan medyasının Batı'dan vurmasına, işgali Batı'dan başlatmasına dikkat edin.

Ellerine Kaleşnikof verdiğin adamlar..

Evet, bu yüzden Aydın Doğan bir ulusal güvenlik sorunudur. Açıktan PKK'ya destek vermiştir. 7 Haziran seçimleri öncesi Demirtaş projesinin mimarıdır. 7 Haziran sonrası geçilen “ikinci aşama”nın destekçisidir. Siyaset ve çözüm üzerinden şehirlere silah yığanların cesaretlendiricisidir.

Bu ülkeye kasteden herkese sahip çıkmış, destek vermiş örtülü darbe girişimleri içinde yer almıştır. Terör üzerinden kaos oluşturup Türkiye'yi hareket edemez hale getirip, iktidar biçimlendirmeyeyeltenmiştir.

Evet, Aydın Doğan pijamayla talimat yağdıracağı, istediği zaman devirebileceği iktidarlar istemektedir. Türkiye'yi, siyaseti önünde diz çöktürmeye zorlamaktadır. Bu olmayınca da intihar saldırılarına savrulmuştur.

Bir cam kırılmış, ortalığı ayağa kaldırıyor. Senin camın kırıldığı gün 16 şehidin acısı bütün ülkeye yayıldı. Onların acısı, bu kayıplar, ülkenin içinde bulunduğu psikolojik durum senin umurunda bile olmadı.

Sen ne yaptın? Yayın organların üzerinden bu şehitleri unutturan yalanlarla Türkiye'yi meşgul ettin. Kiralık kalemlerin, elinde kalem yerine Kalaşnikof tutuşturduğun adamların üzerinden psikolojik operasyona giriştin. Memleket şehitleri unuttu senin camının derdine düştü.

SOKAK TERÖRÜ ÜZERİNDEN BAŞBAKAN DEVİRECEKTİN

Sen ve adamların, sokak terörü üzerinden hükümet düşürmeyekalktığınızda, o vandallık günlerinde terörü ve şiddeti baş tacı ettiniz. Binalar yakılırken, medya araçları yakılırken, Başbakanlık saldırıya uğrarken sen ve adamların onları alkışlıyor, ekranlarından ve sayfalarından onlara övgüler düzüyordunuz.

Sokak terörü üzerinden Başbakan devirecek, belki onu darağacına gönderilmesini sağlayacaktın.
Sen o terör sırasında örgütlerle işbirliği yaptın. Onları medya organların üzerinden akladın. Onları millete pazarladın.

O zaman şiddet yoktu defterinizde. Çünkü o zaman siz şiddetten besleniyordunuz. Şiddet üzerinden iktidar hesabıyla meşguldünüz. Bu yüzden DHKP-C'nin avukatlığını yapıyordunuz.
Şimdi yine terör örgütleri üzerinden iş yürütüyorsun.

PKK ile ne tür pazarlıklar yaptın?

HDP projesinin arkasında hangi petrol hesapları, anlaşmaları vardı. Kuzey Irak'tan Lübnan'a, İran'a hangi örtülü enerji operasyonları içindesin? O yalanlama açıklaman, işin doğruluğunu ortaya koydu. Türkiye ilk kez senin o taraftaki hesaplarından haberdar oldu. Daha neler çıkacak, göreceksin.

Sen, 28 Şubat'ın arkasındaki güçtün. Binlerce insanın fişlenmesinin arkasındaki isimlerden biriydin. Koca Türkiye'nin İsrail'e peşkeş çekilmesinin pazarlamacısıydın.
Sen hükümet kurup hükümet yıkıyordun. Bakanlar atıyor, bakanlar fırçalıyordun.

Demirtaş projesi üzerinden hesabın AK Parti'yi tek başına iktidar olmaktan uzaklaştırmaktı. Şimdi daha ileri gittin. Şehit kanları üzerinden, terör saldırıları üzerinden intikam almaya devam ediyorsun. Daha kötüsünü, çirkinini tezgahlıyorsun.

Tetiği çeken sensin

Sen Aydın Doğan, demokrasi dışı bütün unsurları bu savaşa davet ediyor, onlar üzerinden darbe senaryoları uyguluyorsun.

Bu ülkenin otuz yılında senin kirli hesapların var. Otuz yılında senin örtülü operasyonların var. Seni bir intihar bombacısı gibi ortaya salan, ön cepheye yerleştirenlerin seni kurban da verebileceğini hiç aklından çıkarma.

Bir olağanüstü hal peşindesin. Bu yüzden Demirtaş gibi bir “ölü sevici”yi besledin, büyüttün. Talimat verircesine, her sözünden sonra, bu sözlere uygun saldırılar yapıyorlar. Bu talimatlardan senin de haberin var mı Aydın Doğan? Nedir bu, sen Demirtaş'a, Demirtaş da PKK'ya mı mesaj yolluyorsunuz.

Evet, Aydın Doğan, sen bir iç savaş peşindesin. Milleti birbirine kırdırma peşindesin. Türkiye'yi Suriyeleştirme peşindesin. Alevi-Sünni çatışması, Türk-Kürt çatışması peşindesin. Bu senaryolar her kiminse, sen bu senaryoların pazarlamacısısın. Ön cephedesin, tetiği çeken sensin. Nasıl bir ihale aldıysan, o ihale ile birlikte yok olup gidebilirsin, unutma.

Her saldırıda seni anacağız

PKK'nın her saldırısında seni anacağız, bu ülkenin her şehidine ağıt yakarken seni düşüneceğiz, bunu hiç aklından çıkarma.
AK Parti devrilebilir, siyasetten gidebilir, çekilebilir. Ama memleket senin de başına çöker, unutma. Senin de saltanatın biter, karargahın yerle bir olur, unutma.
Bu ülke çökerse coğrafya biter. Bu ülke çökerse hiç birimiz için gelecek kalmaz. Bu ülke çökerse bedeli ilk ödeyenlerden biri sen olursun, unutma.

Teröre karşı tek cümle edemedin. Gazetelerin tek cümle yazamadı, televizyonların gerçeği haykıramadı, tavır almadı. Tam tersine övgüler düzmeye devam ediyorsunuz. Askerlerimiz, polislerimiz şehit olurken sen bir kırık camla bütün ülkeyi meşgul ediyorsun. Millet ağıt yakarken sen bir yalan haberle ülkeyi meşgul etmeye devam ediyorsun. Bir yalanla saldırılara tepkiyi önledin, PKK'yı korudun, dikkatleri saldırılardan başka yöne çektin.

Terör etiketinden kurtulamayacaksın

Sen bu halinle PKK gibi cinayetler işledin. Biz şehit olurken, biz bedel öderken sen saz çal Aydın Doğan. Katillerle el ele ver memleketi iğfal et, kıs kıs gül…

Bu etiket senin üzerine yapıştı. Her PKK saldırısında, şehirlerdeki her patlamada senin adın da anılacak. İnsanlar söylemeseler de bunu zihinlerinden hiç çıkarmayacak Aydın Doğan…

Ne kadar “1 Kasım'ı yaptırmayacağız” desen de bu seçimler yapılacak, Türkiye'nin meşru kanalları işleyecek, istediğiniz felç hali mümkün olmayacak Aydın Doğan.

Günahlarınla kalakalacaksın ortada. Ardından yine ağlakaçıklamalar yayınlayıp, vatan millet edebiyatı yapıp kapı kapı dolaşacak, yalvar yakar olacaksın Aydın Doğan.

Senin karargahların iç işgal karargahlarıdır. PKK doğudan vurur sen için için sevinirsin. Ellerini ovuşturur “işler yolunda gidiyor” dersin.

İşgal Doğu›da başlatıldı Aydın Doğan, sen bu işgali Batı'dan yürütüyorsun.
İşgalin “Batı Cephesi” komutanı
Unutma, teröre karşı da, senin işgal hesaplarına karşı da, “acımasız direniş” devam edecek. Hem PKK terörüne, hem onun arkasındaki bölgesel harita çizenlere hem de işgalin Batı Cephesi komutanı Aydın Doğan'a karşı acımasız direniş olacaktır bu.

Senin adam; “hükümet şiddetle arasına mesafe koysun” diyor. Akıl alır gibi değil. Savcının başına silah dayayan o terör örgütünü sen pazarlamadın mı? O fotoğrafı yayınlayarak gazetenin DHKP-C'nin emrine vermedin mi? Gezi olaylarında örgütlerin sözcülüğünü yapmadın mı, o örgütlerin cinayetlerinisavunmadın mı? En marjinal gazetede bile bu kadarı yapılamazdı..

Siyasi hesaplarını PKK'ya ihale etmiş

Mesele sadece PKK değil. Türkiye'nin bir iç işgal sorunu var. Doğan grubu bütün gücüyle bu işgal girişiminin içinde. Savruldukları en uç noktada terörle birlikte hareket ediyorlar. PKK ile, HDP ile birlikte hareket ediyorlar. Artık bu saatten sonra, bu kamuoyu baskısından sonra önceki kadar rahat cümle kuramayacaklar. Çark etmiş görünecekler. Teröre göstermelik lanetler yağdıracaklar. Ama en kritik zamanda yine vuracaklar.

Aydın Doğan, siyasi hesaplarını terör örgütlerine, son safhada da PKK'ya ihale etmiş durumda. Ortada bir hesap, bir pazarlık, bir ortaklık var. Türkiye bu gerçeği görmeli. Terörü lanetlerken arkasındaki bu gizli ittifakı anlamalı.

Milletin yanında dimdik duranlar, dağlarda, şehirlerde ülke müdafaası verenler, Türkiye'ye karşı yeni bir cephe açıldığınıbilmeli ve bu cephenin arkasındaki ortaklığa meydan okumalı.

Evet, Aydın Doğan bir ulusal güvenlik meselesidir ve durduğu yer terör üzerinden darbe girişimidir. Evet, Türkiye saldırı altındadır ve tetiği çekenler bellidir!

Read more

Kaybedenler Kulübü

Amerika, Irak ve Afganistan'a girdi. Harcadığı parayı bilen yok. Aldığı götürdüğü petrol, maden, kaynak yok! Ama çuvalla para harcadı. Sonunda da "Ben çekiliyorum!" diyerek gitti! Bu NOKTADAN sonra Ortadoğu'da yeni bir sayfa açıldı. Dengeler tamamen değişmek üzere sarsılmaya başladı.

Ama bizler, içeride kavga etmekten kimin kimin ayağına bastığını görmüyorduk. "PKK" diye özenle icat edilmiş bir örgüt Türkler'in de Kürtler'in de enerjisini alıyor, kaynaklarımızın sokağa dökülmesine neden oluyordu. Oysa kapımızın önünde yeni bir dünya kuruluyordu.

Dünyaya yaşadığımız günden bakarsak anlamakta zorlanırız!

Arap-İsrail savaşında PETROL KRİZİ yaşandı. Petrolün fiyatı arttı. Üretim de azaldı. AVRUPA artan fiyatları karşılayabilmek için DOLARLA ihracat yollarını zorladı. Ama artan petrol fiyatları Avrupa'yı zora soktu. Aynı anda ABD ise artan fiyatlar nedeniyle PETROLDEN UZAK DURDU!

Kendi rezervine yöneldi. Çıkarıp kulandı. Hem ödemeler dengesini korudu hem de rakibi olan Avrupa'yı finansal olarak çökertti!

Petrol üreticisi olan Suudi Arabistan, Birleşik Arap Emirlikleri, Libya gibi ülkeler de ise bu dönemde FAZLA DOLAR oluştu. Bunları da BANKA yoluyla ABD kendine çekti. Bunlar daha sonra gelişmekte olan ülkelere KREDİ olarak dağıtıldı. Bu kadar da değildi! Rus-

Afgan Savaşı'nda para yine petrol üreticisi ülkelerden geliyordu. Kendi başlarına bırakılmazlardı zaten.

Ya silah ya gayrimenkul ya tahvil almak zorundaydılar... Para onlarda kalamazdı. "Kalsın!" diyen giderdi!

Arap-İsrail Savaşı'ndaki ABD'nin tutumu AVRUPA ile giriştikleri büyük mücadelenin yansımasıydı. İlk golü atmışlardı. Geri çekilmeye hiç niyetleri yoktu!

Mesela NATO!

ABD ile Avrupa arasındaki "DAYANIŞMA" diye biliniyordu. Her ikisini de sarı saçlı mavi gözlü görünce "BUNLAR KARDEŞ!" diyorduk. Oysa gerçek başkaydı. ABD, Avrupa'yı kontrol etmek istiyordu.

İkinci Dünya Savaşı'ndan sonra YALTA'da Roosevelt ile Stalin anlaştı.

İçeride anlaşanlar çıkıp KAVGA görüntüsü verdi. Büyük oyun böyle başladı. Daha sonraki yıllarda GORBAÇOV ile duvarlar yıkılırken, SSCB dağılırken NATO genişliyordu! Sovyet tehdidine karşı kurulan ÖRGÜT tehlike gitmesine rağmen BALKANLAR'a ve AVRASYA'ya yayılma amacını taşıyordu. Aslında operasyon başından beri Avrupa'ya karşıydı.

ABD, NATO ile Avrupa'ya "Paran da olabilir, nüfusun da olabilir, medeniyet de kurabilirsin ama seni asla ASKERİ güç yaptırmayacağım!" diyordu.

NATO ile Avrupa'da her yere giriyorlardı. Sovyetler yıkılsa da durmuyorlardı!

Çünkü oyunun sonunda görmek istedikleri bambaşka bir FİNAL vardı!

Amerika, Irak'a iki kez KÜRTLER'i Araplar'dan ayırmak için girdi. Kendi çıkarları için en doğrusu buydu. Biz her şeyi düşman ve dost tanımında ele alırken adamlar İKTİSADİ düşünüyordu! Dünyada yüzlerce noktayı kontrol eden Amerika, PKK konusunda da Avrupa ile çekişme içindeydi! Mücadele bu hatta da sürüyordu! PKK artık bitmişti!

Sorun kimin Kürtler'i yanına alacağıydı! Soru çok önemli cevap ise daha da önemliydi!

Amerika büyük ortağı olan RUSYA'yı GAZ konusunda serbest bıraktı. Moskova hem Avrupa'ya, hem bize, hem de Çin'e gaz verebiliyordu. Geliri de zaten petrol ve gaz'dandı! Ancak Irak ve Afganistan'a giren ABD petrolün ALTIN DEĞERİNDE BİR ÜRÜN OLMASINI istemiyordu! Petrole para harcamak da istemiyordu.

Bunun yerine NÜKLEER gibi alternatif enerjilere yönelecekti.

Nükleer de onların, yani ABDRusya ikilisinin, tekelinde olacaktı.

İngiliz istihbaratının kontrolünde olan GREENPEACE bu nedenle NÜKLEERE karşı çıkıyordu! Yeşil çevre için değil.

Amerika hem Kürtler'i hem IŞİD'i destekliyordu. Amacı bölgede Avrupa ve EURO'nun enerji trafiğini engellemekti. Bunu da Türkler'in Kürtler'i kucaklamasıyla yapacağını biliyordu. Kendi varlıkları için Türkiye'nin büyümesi şarttı! Avrupa için ise tam tersi. PETROLÜN oyun sahasından çekilmesi sonları olurdu! Bunun için hem Türkiye'nin hem Kürtler'in hem de PKK'nın kontrol edilmesi gerekiyordu.

İçerideki sıkıntılarımızın nedeni buydu!

Bakın dün Türkiye'den kaçan bütün SOLCULAR Avrupa'ya giderdi bugün de SAVCILAR! Neden? Kimse bir şey almadığı birine kapısını açmaz! Bizden kaçan kim varsa hep soluğu Avrupa'da alırdı.

PKK'nın ofislerine bakın! Avrupa'da her yerde! Türk devleti sözde Kürtler'e kötü davranıyordu! Avrupa bu kadar vicdanlı ise Afrika'da yardım ve destek bekleyen çok ülke vardı! Neden gitmiyordu? Onlara zayıf Türk ve kullanacakları Kürt lazımdı!

Bazı arkadaşlara söyledim ama anlamadılar! Dünyayı yöneten iki dev ABD-Rusya bizdeki bazı grupları TASFİYE etti!

Almanya'ya kaçan savcılar, PKK adına konuşanlar hep bu gruba dahil. Göremediler... Yoksa biz onların düşmanı değiliz ki! Şahsen bu ülkede yaşayan hiç kimsenin burnunun kanamasını istemem!

Böyle bakarım. Kimseyle de bir alıp veremediğim yok. Ama DOĞRULAR acı!

Şimdi daha önce ABD tarafından el uzatılan yapılara AVRUPA çullanacak! Ankara'yı zayıflatmak için alıp kullanmak isteyecek. İSTİHBARAT DÜNYASI TOPYEKUN İŞİN İÇİNDE! Ekonomide ve enerjide büyük plan tıkır tıkır işliyor! Şifreler değişiyor. 2000'lerin başında PETROL fiyatlarını tavan yaptırıp Putin'e destek olan ABD, şimdi tersini yapıyor. Rothschildler'i ülkesinden artan fiyatların getirdiği parayla kovan Putin, şimdilerde GAZ konusuna odaklanmış durumda! NEDEN? Arap ülkelerini zor günler bekleyecek. Hanedanlar panikte! Sınırlar değişecek, DEMOKRASİ bu kez gerçekten gelecek! Gelmek zorunda çünkü!

Bunları görmeden Türkiye'yi ve bölgeyi anlamak kolay değil. Adına ne dersiniz bilemem ama Türkiye çok büyük bir devlet olarak bölgeyi kontrol edecek. Kürt kardeşlerini de yanına alarak... Petrole ulaşmak isteyecek olan AVRUPA dizginlenecek. Onlar kaybedecek, biz kazanacağız!

Eee, OSMANLI'yı yıkarken düşüneceklerdi! 100 yıllık rövanş bu!

İşte bu sevinci bize yaşatmamak için bütün güçleriyle gelecekler.

Türkiye düştü mü bölge de ABD de Rusya da gider!

Kavga böyle büyük ve derin!

Ama 100 yıl sonra kaldığımız yerden devam edeceğiz... Bir de bunu içeridekiler anlasa... Rüzgara karşı tükürdüklerinin farkına varsalar... Bu denklemde ne saz çalan arkadaşın ne Kandil'de her gün konuşan bir PKK'lının, ne de bunların arkasında duran MEDYANIN önemi var! Sadece kaybedenler kulübünün üyelerini artırıyorlar!

Bizden söylemesi!

Read more

Losers club

America went to Iraq and Afghanistan. He's spending knows. It took to receive the oil, mining, there are resources! But I spent a lot of money. At the end, "I'm off!" he went on saying! At this point, a new page opened in the Middle East. About to change completely the balance began to shake.
Who's stepping on whose side you're fighting inside of us but we didn't see. "The PKK" Turks and Kurds and the energy he carefully invented an organization is taking in the street was causing the loss of our resources. However, it established a new world in front of our door.
If we look at the days we are struggling to understand the world we live in!
The Arab-Israeli war and the oil crisis was there. The price of oil has increased. Production also decreased. Forced their way through Europe in order to meet the rising prices of dollars of exports. But rising oil prices to Europe. At the same time due to rising prices in the US away from oil STOPPED!
Headed into their reserves. Was out of use. Europe retained the balance of payments both financially rival both crashed!
Oil producer, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, countries such as Libya more dollars in this period also occurred. He pulled them through US BANK. These will then be distributed as loans to developing countries. It wasn't that bad! Russian-
Again money was coming from the oil-producing countries in the Afghan war. Left on their own, they couldn't.
Either they have the money or bonds or real estate they had to buy a gun... he couldn't. "Leave it!" who would say!
The Arab-Israeli war struggle with the United States in Europe was a reflection of the attitude of the biggest they have. They threw the first goal. They had no intention to withdraw!
For example, NATO's!
Between the US and Europe "SOLIDARITY" it was called. Both blond-haired, blue-eyed seeing "they're sisters!" we were saying. In fact, the real President was. The US, Europe wanted to check out.
After the Second World War, at Yalta, Roosevelt agreed with Stalin.
They gave the image of anlasanl go out and fight the inside. The big game started like this. In later years, when the walls collapse with Gorbachev, the USSR was expanding NATO in the study! Founded to counter the Soviet threat, the organization in spite of the danger, was meant to spread to the Balkans and Eurasia. In fact, since the beginning of Europe was opposed to the operation.
USA, NATO and Europe, "it could be Money, there may be a population, you can build a civilization, but you never know I'm not getting military power."
They were going everywhere in Europe with NATO. Soviet it didn't seem though the heavens fall!
What they want to see at the end of the game had a different finale!
America, two tours in Iraq Kurds to separate from the Arabs entered. It was the right thing for your own interests. The definition of the enemy and the friend we do everything in addressing economic thought men! Hundreds controls the point in the world, the United States, which it was in contention with Europe on the issue of the PKK! Is this even a fight it was too long! The PKK was now over!
The Kurds, who's the problem he was gonna get away with it! Even more important, it was important to answer the question!
The major partner in America which is released on Russia gas. Moscow and Europe, the US and could provide gas to China. Oil and gas income already was! However, U.S. oil into Iraq and Afghanistan didn't want to have a product that is worth of gold! Did not want to spend money on oil.
Instead, I was directed to alternative energy such as NUCLEAR.
Their nuclear, the U.S. and the Russian Duo, it would be a monopoly.
Greenpeace was opposed to nuclear power, which is therefore under the control of British Intelligence! Yesil for the environment.
There was both support ISID America and the Kurds. The aim was to prevent the energy of European and Euro traffic in the region. She knew she was going to embrace the Kurds, the Turks also. For their assets was essential to Turkey's growth! For Europe, it's the reverse. The withdrawal of oil from the Ballpark would be the end of it! This is supposed to be controlled by both Turkey and the PKK and the Kurds.
Inside it was the cause of our troubles!
Yesterday was Turkey and all the leftists who escaped from prosecutors go to Europe today! Why? No one does not open the door to someone he didn't take anything! Whoever you end up always escaped us in Europe would take.
Refer to the Office of the PKK! Everywhere in Europe! The Kurds of the Turkish state alleged he was acting bad! There were so scrupulous in Africa many countries in Europe for help and support! Why didn't you go? He had a weak Turkish and they will use them to the wolf!
I told some friends, but they didn't understand! That govern the world's two giant U.S.-Russia liquidated some groups in the US!
The prosecutors, who escaped to Germany, are included in this group are always those who speak on behalf of the PKK. They couldn't see them... or we we're not the enemy! Personally, I don't want anyone in this country's nose to Bleed!
I'll look like this. I have no quarrel with anyone. But the truth is bitter!
Hand extended structures in europe by us previously now crowd! Buy Ankara will want to use to weaken. THE INTELLIGENCE WORLD IS IN THE BUSINESS OF WHOLESALE! Big energy in the economy and the plan is working! Changing passwords. In the early 2000s, oil prices skyrocket and the US who support Putin, are now doing the opposite. The countries with the money from the increasing prices brought about by the hive rothschildler Putin, now focusses on gas! WHY? The Arab countries will wait for hard times. Dynasties panic! Boundaries will change, DEMOCRACY is really coming this time! Because you have to come!
Turkey and the region are not easy to understand without seeing them. I don't know about the name, but the region as a very large Turkey will control the state. EUROPEAN oil by brothers who want to get the wolf... all right. They lose, we win!
So, they'd think you're washing the Ottoman! It's a rematch of 100 years!
This joy given to us with all their strength they come.
If Turkey fell on the region, the United States also goes to Russia!
A fight this big and it's deep!
But 100 years later, we will continue where we left off... she understands and the people in it, learn to spit against the wind in this equation... what if banjo-playing friend who speaks every day what was a PKK militants in the lamp, nor the importance of the media behind them! Only losers club members are increasing!
Insider tip!

Read more