we left the strength of si, 'Ulubatlı Hasan, do you not have named?' we are discussing. However, there is Makarios, which is the source of everything in the Book of hadith, planted the flag on the wall.
Flag the contrary, Ulubatlı Hasan after he fell martyr "it is written that the other tower was erected by the soldiers who fought in it. As you see, a "AQL-I evvel" flags and the stars and ulubatli to patch tekrarlanagelmis without question.
A similar distortion in the story of the abolition of the Caliphate bears the scars of efforts. Although no Caliph abdülmecid requested that the allocation be increased, no went to Friday prayers in a pompous ceremony in power, there's no eye...
Now the UK and its allies and the force is removed because of the pressure of the Caliphate should be able to tell clearly that it is mandatory to have a day that is very much desired, otherwise this state to keep them alive should they confess that, let the community know the facts.
A lecturer at the University of Central Florida report found in the archives of the U.S. ozoglu Hakan, a U.S. diplomat reported to Washington that would abolish the Caliphate of us found out and reveals that before. Washington report 25 February 1924, had reached. In other words, without people knowing about it a week ago in Turkey, France and the US authorities learned that the Caliphate will be abolished ("Action", 13 December 2010).
What this means is the following: the abolition of the Caliphate and the western world he's been waiting since he wanted to Lausanne. Where's the news the Caliphate were abolished, for the period 1. The inspector of the army, so where you live the Caliph in Istanbul, with responsibility for Karabekir Pasha, I'll have learned even from the newspapers, you get the picture.The caption of this cartoon made after the abolition of the Caliphate "in the beginning of the millet others," it says.
The first ball is thrown the reigns of the caliphs. The other ball on the end of the rabbi's and the patriarchs. However, sufficient power to the Caliph, others not enough.
Hakan Ozoglu "The Power Struggle In The Establishment Of The Republic" (Book Pub., In his 2011 book includes an interesting analysis: Ankara, in 1922 the Sultanate moved in, but dared not touch the Caliphate and the Ottoman dynasty. Karabekir Pasha as opposition because, Istanbul, Ottoman-era politicians they did cover themselves with the Ottoman Caliphate, behind him were trying to organize their opposition. To be digested and eliminated from the circuit of the opposition front of the Caliphate had to be removed. Then, the purge sequence, the others would come anyway.
The author, riding the Ottoman dynasty in 1922 Ankara government probably all he will make his move so he didn't trust himself abroad, he says. However, kazım karabekir, 1922, the Caliphate the Ottoman Dynasty from the writing of the plan itself is prevented. Though the Caliphate by Mustafa Kemal writes that intends to spend on its own, but that's not the point. Important, 1922, in Ankara, Turkey, the Caliphate, the Ottoman is made to extort from the fact that a political move.
The final provision of ozoglu Hakan, Ankara, Turkey, the Caliphate, the dynasty to eliminate the threat is removed. In other words, "lagvedilme the target in the Caliphate, the Caliph, the Ottoman dynasty."
However, the external dynamics of the subject on a broader basis and therefore will not be neglected should be established, I think. I think going to the abolition of the Caliphate and secularism, imposed in Lausanne, Turkey was permitted on the establishment of this condition. This is placed in a separate article to the treaty, although the Muslims of the Ottoman Empire, the Caliphate was the return of former occupants from the same privileges and rights, explaining that in this new era will be on the agenda of the Caliphate that was the clue.On January 10, 1924, King George V. his speech to the house of Commons stated in the paragraph related to Turkey "as soon as it is approved Lausanne will open a new era" it is said.
Now I know someone will be so furious. But you have the benefit of forcing you to remain calm. A major personal testimony peek out the official document to be published here for the first time, they'll decide.
Testimony before let's take a look at:
Kazım karabekir, 16 August 1923, Ismet Pasha, the ideas you are hearing from the government circles recently that came from Lausanne, in the opinion tells us that he is against the religion. According to him, the Prophet (pbuh) and the Quran "about this dangerous weather" from Lausanne is blowing. Ismet Pasha to him 1. The Hungarians and the Bulgarians in World War I even though they lost independence is being spared because they were Christian like us, simply because we are Muslims and do our part, removed of our independence gives the answer: "as long as we win our independence, our own strength even Muslim, and in the meantime the colonial governments, especially the British, they would always be against us, always told us that our independence would be in danger."
Isn't that clear enough? Thus, Ismet inönü, the Muslim would have to admit that the idea of our identity have been distancing in Lausanne.
The British National Archives (National Archives), which will be published here for the first time and I found a "secret" document, which will clearly demonstrate the Caliphate of Lausanne's connection. 10 January 1924, King George V of England, in his keynote address to the house of Commons, on parliament's agenda for consideration of the bill that concerns Lausanne after specifying the immediate future, are administered following striking sentence:
"After this bill passes, the Treaty of Lausanne will be approved and will open a new era." (As soon as this bill has been passed, the treaty will be ratified, and a new era will open.) (CAB/23/46, s. 424)
King George V, Great Britain Lausanne for the adoption of "a new era or the term" what did you mean when you said You will open? This can be interpreted as a kind of salvation from the gospel of the Caliph? Clearly we don't know. However, the British abolition of the Caliphate for themselves in a world hilafetsiz Lausanne and expect to confirm a "new era"obviously thought that would be tantamount to opening.
Indeed, the bill of Lausanne expected to have been raised in the house of Commons April 1924, received and accepted in August and approved by other States Parties in September 1924 cemiyet-I certified by the league. This means that before the end of the first year of the Republic remained for a little while yet, although TC was not a recognized state. Khilafah node are solved, the recognition also began to arrive. Now liquidation operations could begin.
Yorum Gönder